![]() ![]() foreign-policy establishment wants to fight a real war for Ukraine, a tacit acknowledgement that this is not, in fact, a truly vital interest.īy contrast, Russia has made it clear it is willing to use force to achieve its core objective, which is to keep Ukraine from joining NATO-not just now but at any point in the foreseeable future. Apart from a few hotheads, nobody in the U.S. ![]() military personnel and relocating its diplomats. If anything, the United States has sent the opposite message by withdrawing U.S. troops to fight for Ukraine, and no important European countries are proposing to do so themselves. President Joe Biden has made it clear that the United States is not going to send U.S. interests.įor starters, I’m puzzled by the gap between the level of resolve conveyed by the United States and NATO and the diplomatic position the alliance has taken. ![]() These reflexive responses are making a bad situation worse and are likely to do further damage to Ukraine and to broader U.S. But I can’t do that because key aspects of the crisis strike me as puzzling, and I keep hearing echoes of the same beliefs, tropes, and engrained orthodoxies that have led U.S. In some ways, I wish I could subscribe to this view because it would allow me to stop thinking about this complicated set of issues and join the chorus. troops to Europe (though not to Ukraine itself), and proceed with tough economic sanctions if Russia invades. ![]() The near-total consensus is it’s all Russian President Vladimir Putin’s fault Russia’s stated grievances have no legitimate basis whatsoever and the only conceivable Western response is to refuse to make any concessions, stand up to Moscow, send more U.S. With some notable exceptions, opinion and commentary in the West have solidified around a black-and-white view of the situation in Ukraine. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |